1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport:

The authenticity of each of the above documents is presumed to have been established since there is no dispute over the part of the defendant's stamp image in the certificate Nos. 1, 2, and 2-1, 8 (Commission Contract), and the certificate Nos. 9-1 (joint and several surety for the certificate of financial guarantee, commission contract, and financial guarantee). The defendant asserts that each of the above documents was forged by the plaintiff's employees, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it. In full view of the purport of the whole arguments, the plaintiff shall entrust B with the affairs such as brokerage of insurance contract, etc., and pay subscription fees in advance on the premise that the insurance premium is deposited normally for two years in the new insurance contract, but if the insurance premium is not paid continuously due to the lapse or termination, etc., the plaintiff shall pay subscription fees in advance to the plaintiff at the rate of 1, 2010, which is the joint and several surety's obligation to return the subscription allowances, etc. already received pursuant to Article 8 (Recovery of Allowances) of the Guidelines for the Payment of Design Director's Allowances to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.