logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2021.02.16 2021고단24
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

400,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, etc. On November 3, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on November 3, 2017. On March 13, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on March 13, 2019. On November 23, 2019.

[2] A person who is not a handler of narcotics shall not possess, possess, use, transport, manage, import, export, manufacture, prepare, administer, administer, deliver, sell, intermediate the trade of, or provide narcotics or psychotropic drugs. The defendant is not a handler of narcotics.

1. On January 9, 2021, the Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. from Handphones (filphones) by selling and buying phiphones (hereinafter “Handphones”) by paying approximately 0.4g of cash 40,000 won from D (51 tax) on the street in front of C located in the North Gun, Gun, U.S., Gun.B. (hereinafter “Handphones”).

Accordingly, the defendant purchased a local mental medicine even though he is not a narcotics handler.

2. On January 9, 2021, the Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. due to the administration of philophones (fluence) put about 0.05g of philophones purchased from D into a single-time clusium in around 22:0, 2021, and then injected into the Defendant’s right trade clusium, after dilution with water.

As a result, the Defendant administered a local mental medicine even though he is not a narcotics handler.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A certificate of small-scale inspection for reagentss;

1. Investigation report (the result of the examination of reagents for cancer patients);

1. A copy of a medical opinion;

1. A criminal investigation report (to confirm the symptoms of each suspect's wife F telephone conversations, mers amba, etc.);

1. An investigation report (a correction of a dose to be administered by Mesphere, or a person to whom the dose is corrected;

arrow