logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.06.01 2016고단13
사기
Text

The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. On November 12, 2013, the summary of the facts charged was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months as a special larceny teacher for a special larceny teacher in the branch of the Changwon District Court, and the judgment on May 29, 2015 became final and conclusive.

A. On September 12, 2008, the Defendant was guilty of KRW 20 million, at the D office located in Jinju-si Co., Ltd. (C) around September 12, 2008, and the victim E is required to pay salary and bonus to the employees of the company, and there is no money.

Even if the bonds have been borrowed, it was intended to purchase the 3,00 tons of the previous 3,00 tons of the unused variable in the intermittent value, and the profits will be repaid within three months.

LH made a false statement that “The construction of the water removal of the land of the scheduled site of the multi-family housing ordered for modern construction has been subcontracted in KRW 26 billion, making it possible to re-subcontract 10 billion, and there is a value of KRW 10 billion even within the factory.”

However, the defendant did not have entered into a contract for the pre-sale and the sub-sale of water on the ground, and the factory had no collateral value due to the establishment of the collateral, and there was no economic difficulty due to financial standing, and even if he borrowed money to the victim due to non-performing loans which are difficult to recover, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred KRW 20 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of F, the Defendant, who was aware of the same day from the victim.

B. Around November 4, 2008, the Defendant of KRW 30 million was awarded a subcontract to the victim E at the office D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D office”) for the period of KRW 26 billion, since the date of advance payment was postponed for two months, the Defendant may receive advance payment from the victim E by preparing temporary site offices, equipment, etc. at the removal site office.

If the funds to be prepared are additionally lent, the full repayment will be made with the loan of KRW 20 million prior to the loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

(b).

arrow