1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. 1) The plaintiff is the People's Republic of China (hereinafter "China").

(2) On September 1, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission of simplified naturalization under Article 6(2)1 of the Nationality Act (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant on September 28, 201, under the name of “B (B)”, and filed a marriage report with D citizens of the Republic of Korea. On April 14, 2006, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a spouse status of the citizen. 2) On September 10, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission of simplified naturalization under the name of “B” with the Defendant, and obtained permission of simplified naturalization from the Defendant on February 28, 201.

On June 28, 2011, the Plaintiff obtained a name permit from the Seoul Eastern District Court to change the name from “B” to “A”, and completed the opening report on July 5, 201.

B. On the other hand, on December 1, 1985, the Plaintiff reported a marriage with E who is a Chinese citizen, and on March 18, 1987, the Plaintiff gave birth to F between E and E. 2) filed an application for special naturalization with the Defendant. While the Defendant examined the above application, it was found that F’s name was not B but G (G, H).

3) Accordingly, on January 19, 2015, the Defendant revoked permission for naturalization of the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 21 of the Nationality Act and Article 27 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act on the ground that the Plaintiff acquired the nationality of the Republic of Korea with false personal information (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(i) [In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1, 9 through 14, Eul evidence 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff was born between I and J, who is a Chinese national, at C's Dog-ro, and was adopted to K and L around 1968, and thereafter used the name “B” from that time.

B. Around 1985, the plaintiff was pregnant while teaching E with a Chinese citizen. At the time, the plaintiff should be 20 years of age in China.