logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.08.09 2013고정702
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. B and joint-offender B are operators operating a business with the trade name “D” on the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2, Ulsan-gu, and the Defendant is an employee who provides the service, such as guiding customers and viewing a guide in the above business place.

Around November 24, 2012, the Defendant and B arranged to engage in commercial sex acts more than three-five times a day to unspecified customers by the said method from March 2012 to November 24, 2012, including having male customers and E, an employee of the said business place, who were unable to know the names sought in order to engage in commercial sex acts in the said D, who are sexual intercourse once with each other, and receive 100,000 won under the pretext of commercial sex acts.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The sole criminal defendant is a person who operates a door-free place on the 3th floor of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, even though he is not a medical person.

On April 2012, the Defendant: (a) taken a color tag on the upper left shoulder of E at the above gateic procedure; and (b) took a gate operation in a way that puts the color in the above gate; and (c) carried out a gate operation in a way that puts the color in the above gate.

B. Around October 2012, the Defendant, at the place of the above literary procedure, performed a grammal procedure in the shape of excessive fishing on G et al. in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph.

C. On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) around October 2012, at the above gate clinic, performed a gate surgery in the shape of female H, such as H, by the same method as that of the preceding paragraph.

Accordingly, the defendant was not a medical person, but a non-licensed medical act three times as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect examination of each police in relation to E and B;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning I and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (as to attachment of a field photo, as to voluntary submission, such as A’s equipment for literacy operations, as to attachment of G’s sentences and photographs, and as to the presence of a witness H);

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

arrow