logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.01 2013노508
수산업법위반
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case and the decision of the court below are as follows: “The defendants, even though they were not allowed to operate beyond the boundaries of 107 degrees each south of the extension line between the 107 degrees extension line between the boundary line between the west-do and the Do boundary line between the west-do and the west-do (hereinafter “instant permitted fishing zone”) at the intersection of the coastline, they operated beyond the “fence line between the west-do and the Do boundary line between the west-do and the west-do,” which is the boundary line of the said fishing zone.”

In regard to this, the lower court found the Defendants guilty of all the charges of this case on the premise that the maritime boundary line on the topographical map of the National Land Geographical Information Institute in 1973, “the boundary line on the instant permitted fishing zone, at Gyeongnam-do and Jeonnam-do, was the boundary line on the instant permitted fishing zone, and that the Defendants were engaged in fishing outside the instant permitted fishing zone.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since there is no practice or legal conviction that recognized the maritime boundary line on the topographical map of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Gyeongnam-do in 1973 as the boundary line of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Gyeongnam-do in 1973, the maritime boundary line on the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the 1973 and the Do of the Do of the Do of the Do of the 19

In addition, there is a topographical map produced by the Land Survey Division of the Joseon General in 1920 and this is a priority standard than the Land Geographic Information Institute of Korea in 1973.

Therefore, the maritime boundary line on the topographical map of the National Land Geographical Information Institute in 1973 cannot be seen as the “bridge of the Do in Gyeongnam-do and Jeonnam-do,” which is the boundary line of the instant permitted fishing operation area.

In addition, the topographical map made by the Land Survey Division of the Joseon General in 1920 shall be the topographical map.

arrow