logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.05.02 2018고단3278
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual operator of E (State) who was established on August 1, 2014 for the purpose of gathering and transporting soil and sand with the location of the head office of the Dong-dong, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant B is the head office of the above company.

The Defendants committed as if they concluded a contract with E to supply earth and sand used for the construction of the said facilities with F in connection with the G construction performed by F, and concluded a contract of carriage with the victim H (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) and the damaged company to transport soil from the soil gathering place to the above construction site, and conspired to acquire money from the victimized company as the oil deposit.

Accordingly, around October 27, 2014, the Defendants: (a) placed in a coffee shop in the vicinity of the headquarters of the above E (State); (b) concluded a contract with F (State) in relation to G construction performed by F (State) and to supply earth and sand to be used in the above facility construction work; and (c) paid transport charges to the above construction site. To do so, the aforementioned deposit is required to be returned upon termination or termination of the above transport contract; (d) the aforementioned deposit received additional approval from F (State) and the parties, such as J, etc., who were the representative of the victimized company, to review the feasibility of the project; and (e) Defendant B presented a false letter of approval for the completion of the construction project in the name of F (State) as if he/she did not know of the forgery of the contract.

However, there was no fact that E (State) has entered into a soil supply contract with F (State).

arrow