Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a karaoke machine business operator who operates a “Cinging machine” on the B and the2nd floor of an official week.
No karaoke machine business operator shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages, or employ or arrange a loan for entertainment.
Nevertheless, at around 21:45 on February 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 3,000 won per cans of beer; (b) sold 3 cans of beer; (c) received 30,000 won per hour, and (d) assisted E to provide entertainment by drinking together with the said customer and singing.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;
1. Written statements of D;
1. A copy of registration certificate of singing practice room business;
1. Application of the video CD-related statutes;
1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the relevant Act and Article 22 (1) 3 of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the point of sales of alcoholic beverages and the choice of fines), Article 34 (2) and Article 22 (1) 4 of the Music Industry Promotion Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of arranging a contact loan and the choice of fines);
1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes as provided for in the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes provided for in the violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act concerning good offices for concurrent crimes)
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of the following: (a) the Defendant has no record of committing the crime of the same kind; (b) the Defendant has been subject to an administrative disposition due to the instant crime; (c) although there is confession with the sale of alcoholic beverages; (d) the nature of the crime has been bad; and (e) whether it is contrary to the consistent attitude to criticize the reporter.