Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On April 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on April 13, 2016, and driven the two-lanes of the two middle schools located at the center of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes of the two-lanes in front of the two middle schools located at the center of the city of Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

At the time, since it is an intersection where the signal is installed at night, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and, by his own negligence in contravention of the signal, she was driven by the victim C, who was in direct direction from the fourth distance from end to ends of the end century to the endm of the endm of the end line, shocked the front part of the end head of the endya taxi operated by the Defendant, with even the front part of the end head of the enda taxi of the Defendant, and followed up by the shock, the Defendant’s taxi stopped to the front part of the end of the ends of the end

E The driver's length of the F Kazon is shocked, and the driver's length of the F Kazon was stopped behind the F Kazon.

G Haststy taxi driven by G was shocked.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C (58) on the part of the above occupational negligence, such as double bed and rupture, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim I (58 years of age) aboard the taxi operated by the above C, the injury to supposed under the head-top in need of treatment for about 4 weeks, the injury to the victim J. (57 years of age), the injury to the cumumumumum, tension, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment, the injury to the victim K (61 years of age), the injury to the victim K (61 years of age) such as cump, tension, etc. in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim of L (23 years of age) aboard the taxi operated by the above G, with approximately 2 weeks of treatment for about 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;