The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the case is remanded to Suwon District Court Panel Division.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The degree of formation of a conviction for conviction in a criminal trial must be such that there is no reasonable doubt, but it is not required to exclude all possible doubts that are unreasonable, and rejection by causing a suspicion that has probative value without reasonable grounds is beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

(See Supreme Court Decisions 99Do1018 delivered on April 27, 199, 2004Do2221 delivered on June 25, 2004, etc.). The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant suffered injury, such as an injury to the body of the victim, who was driven by the victim DNA driving in normal length in accordance with the signals from the bend to the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend to the bend of the bend of the bend of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth to the bend of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the e.

On the other hand, the court below, at the time of the accident of this case, tried to build the pedestrian signal of this case on the crosswalk between the exit of this case and the exit of this case No. 6 and the exit of this case No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as "the pedestrian signal of this case") (hereinafter referred to as "the pedestrian signal of this case") at the same time, under the premise that two straight-in signals (hereinafter referred to as "the straight-in signals of this case") from the original right side of the intersection of this case begin at the same time and end at the same time, the straight-in signals of this case are terminated. However, even though the pedestrian signals of this case were about to move to the crosswalk of this case, according to pedestrian signals, pedestrians were already trying to cut to one third point of the crosswalk of this case, and the direction of the pedestrian crossing between the exit of this case No. 5 and the exit of this case No. 4, a different direction.