logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.13 2014나21531
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 28, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a report on new construction of a building with the purport to newly construct a single house of 72.25 square meters per unit, storage facilities, and 40.25 square meters per unit in a permanent resident B, with the scheduled date of commencement of construction to the permanent resident market on April 15, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) b.

On April 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff constitutes the owner of a newly built housing with a total floor area of at least 100 square meters; (b) determined that the Plaintiff constitutes an obligatory insured under the relevant provisions, such as the Employment Insurance Act and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Act on the Collection of Insurance Premiums, etc. for Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”); and (c) sent a statement of subscription to employment insurance and industrial accident compensation insurance by regular mail to C in a case where the Plaintiff’s domicile is registered as the Plaintiff’s owner of a new

C. On May 21, 2013, the Plaintiff did not report the establishment of the employment insurance and industrial accident insurance relationship even after 14 days from the scheduled date of the commencement of the instant construction works. The Defendant, ex officio, pursuant to the provisions related to the Employment Insurance Premium Collection Act, took measures to establish the employment insurance and industrial accident insurance relationship with respect to the instant construction works. The Plaintiff did not pay the employment insurance and industrial accident insurance premium even after 70 days from the scheduled date of the said commencement. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant imposed the employment insurance and industrial accident insurance premium amount of KRW 282,980, and the industrial accident insurance premium of KRW 792,380

On June 25, 2013, the Defendant sent a notice of the disposition of imposition by registered mail to the Plaintiff’s domicile. However, on June 27, 2013, the Defendant returned the notice to the addressee’s unknown; and on July 26, 2013, again sent a notice of the disposition of this case by registered mail, and received it on July 29, 2013 by the Plaintiff.

E. On February 21, 2014, the National Health Insurance Corporation urged the Plaintiff to pay KRW 336,130 with the employment insurance premium, and KRW 877,880 with the industrial accident insurance premium by April 10, 2014.

F. The Plaintiff on October 8, 2013.

arrow