beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A (one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Seoul Western District Court on September 23, 2015, and on February 23, 2017, the Seoul Western Prison completed the execution of the sentence.
Defendant
B On March 28, 2007, he/she was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and attempted larceny at the Seoul Central District Court, and on July 16, 2009, he/she was sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court on November 2, 201, and was sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul East District Court on November 2, 2011, and on April 6, 2016, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced on 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Seoul Western District Court on April 3, 2017.
1. The Defendants used a large number of people in the street near the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, for the crime of joint larceny, and Defendant A conspired to take charge of each of the roles that Defendant A stolen a mobile phone from the external scam of the fluor who is going on the street near the glusium, and Defendant B is waiting in the nearby street in preparation for the detection that Defendant A stolen a mobile phone from the scam of the scam, and that Defendant A stolen a mobile phone and kept it.
On October 27, 2017, at around 19:30, the Defendants waiting in the street near the “E” (Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu) in accordance with the above conspiracys, and Defendant A found that the victim H puts a telephone into the main machine outside the external dose and walked in the street near the club distance of approximately 150 meters away from the straight line at the place of the Defendant A, and caused the victim H to take one 5 gallon-on phone (on a road of KRW 400,00,000) owned by the victim H in the gallon-type of the victim H owned by the victim H, and the Defendant B was dried to the Defendant B.
As above, the Defendants bring the victim H’s portable phone.