A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2015, at around 01:56, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, driving of CAW-to-pubed vehicle, driving the CAW-to-faced vehicle, driving the vehicle at the seat of the Do-to-Do Eup office located in the 308 Do-to-Do Do-to-Do Do-ro, without reducing the speed to the “E amusement shop” page, and driving the vehicle parked on the side with the vehicle parked on the side, and driving the vehicle at the same time as the accident may occur, and the slope G belonging to the TW-to-k police box was driven by the Defendant following the patrol lane.

The Defendant: (a) went into or out of G’s food store D; (b) went away from G to drive, and (c) asked G to present an identification card to confirm the driver’s license, and (d) called “the police conducted a test and appraisal that the police conducted; (b) went back to the stairs of nearby E entertainment centers.”

The Defendant demanded to produce a driver's license in front of the stairs of the E amusement shop, and assaulted G's chests that prevent the Defendant from driving on his front by using hand and shoulder parts for about five minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers G traffic control.

2. On September 18, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties on the grounds of the same ground as paragraph (1) on September 18, 2015, and was compelled to take custody of him/her at the time of a third party, and was driven under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as drinking in the Defendant’s entrance from a slope G, drinking alcohol at a drinking reduction machine, and drinking alcohol at a drinking reduction machine, etc.

Despite the fact that there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the police officer did not comply with a request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested to comply with the measurement of drinking by inserting the 40 minutes of drinking in a total of three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;