A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works with a twitner.

Around 12:00 on February 2, 2017, the Defendant prepared a written complaint to the public service center of the Busan High Police Station located in Busan High-dong, Busan High-dong, and submitted a written complaint to the effect that “B assaulted Defendant’s kneeee on two occasions at the 1st floor parking lot on January 31, 2017,” and that “B assaulted Defendant on two occasions at the 1st floor parking lot on January 31, 2017.” On February 13, 2017, the Defendant made a statement to the same effect as the Busan High Police Station’s Economic Crime Investigation and D Team’s slope located in Busan High-dong, Busan High-dong, and the said D Team E also made a statement to the same effect.

However, the facts are that the above B had decided to work as a health stringer, and the defendant was prevented from driving the above B's vehicle in the process of protesting against the withdrawal of the paid wages without returning the wages in advance, but the above B did not have the fact that the defendant was kneee.

In this respect, the defendant had not been punished against B for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Statement made by the prosecution and the police against the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 156 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate confessions;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the defendant's unlimited liability as above. The crime of this case is not a crime liability, taking into account the fact that the defendant actively infringes on the State's criminal justice function and makes the person under consideration be at risk of being subject to unfair criminal punishment.

However, the sentencing conditions in the records, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the fact that the defendant recognized and led the defendant to the investigation process of the case, the fact that the defendant was not subject to the punishment of the defendant, the fact that the defendant was the first offender, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in