logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014가단128237
유류분
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The fact that C, upon the death of June 11, 2013, his wife D and children, the Plaintiff, Defendant, E, and F jointly inherited C’s property.

The registration of ownership transfer based on legacy on June 11, 2013 with respect to shares 1/2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in each real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by C was completed on November 5, 2013 in the Defendant’s future on June 11, 2013. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute. 2. On February 2, 201, the Plaintiff’s assertion infringed the Plaintiff’s legal reserve of inheritance as to shares 1/11 of the instant real estate by completing the registration of ownership transfer on the entire real estate due to legacy. As such, the Defendant is obligated to return the Plaintiff’s legal reserve of inheritance, such as

3. According to the facts that there is no dispute over the market price and the purport of Eul Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including a serial number), and the whole arguments, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance (the plaintiff's active property at the time of commencement of inheritance including the real property at the time of commencement of inheritance, the property value, which is the basis of calculating legal reserve of inheritance x the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance x the percentage of legal reserve of inheritance x the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance ) more than the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance (the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance x the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance .

4. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow