The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 23:53 on July 23, 2016, was on the front of the funeral hall of the Seocho-si, Youngcho-si, 3, who is in the vicinity of the funeral hall of the Seocho-si.

"E (33) E(33) E(S) E(S) E(S) E(S) E(S) E(S) for the first police station C(112 reported and sent to the site, and the F is required to be a police officer.

In the event that the police officer tried to arrest the EF as a current offender by assaulting the police officer’s body, such as walking the body of the E on the ground of a bad-ro while taking a bath, the police officer tried to arrest the EF as a criminal interfering with the performance of public duties, the Defendant 1 was on the police officer’s wall with the “dle to the fluor’s body.”

“Along with the Defendant’s hand, the Defendant inflicted a victim’s left arms on his hand, and assaulted the Defendant E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field, public safety and maintenance of order.

2. As evidence directly related to the facts charged in the instant case, there are the statements of the police E and CCTV images taken at the time of the recording.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, each of the above evidence alone was proven without reasonable doubt.

It is insufficient to view.

In view of the video that contained the situation at the time, E can be confirmed that she attempted to take a lock over two times, and the first attempt is from 23:5:10 to 23:55:50, and the second attempt is from 23:50 to 23:56:35.

In the process of causing F in excess of E after the first City/Do, it is difficult to confirm the appearance of the defendant being able to be able to turn on at least 23:56:35.

E At the second trial date on the date of the second trial on whether the defendant interfered with the defendant's act was time, E means that the defendant was suffering from his own arms during the first trial period (23:5:30 note).

Three public trial days after the statement was made.