The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and 40 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment lectures) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no record of sexual crimes, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant put his hand into the victim's clothes and only booms the chest, and it seems that the sexual humiliation and mental impulses that he had experienced by the her aged victim were reasonable, and that he did not receive a letter from the injured party until now is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, method and circumstance after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.