logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.08 2018고합165
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 120 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

A. On June 29, 2018, from around 12:00 to around 13:00, the Defendant paid 300,000 won to D (the age of 14) who is female juvenile in return for sexual traffic at the Defendant’s home located in Songpa-gu apartment No. C, Songpa-gu, Seoul, to female juvenile in return for sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing juvenile sex.

B. From June 29, 2018 to 14:00 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant paid KRW 500,000 to E (one hundred thousand, five years of age), a female juvenile, (one hundred, six years of age), in return for sexual traffic, at the Defendant’s home, and paid KRW 1,00,00 to E, F (one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, and another time, and two times of sexual intercourse with F, respectively.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing the sex of the juveniles.

(c)

On June 30, 2018, from around 20:07 to 20:50, the Defendant: (a) called “G” to mean “G,” and, if taken, the Defendant would give 4.5 million won, including the price for sexual traffic (referring to the price for sexual traffic as described in the above A., B.) that was not previously known, to the Defendant’s home.” On July 1, 2018, the Defendant sent D, E, and F, to the Defendant’s home.

Accordingly, the defendant recommended the juveniles to sell sex.

2. The defrauded did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even in the case of sexual traffic with the victim D, E, F.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) A, would give KRW 300,000 to the victim D in return for sexual traffic, KRW 500,000 to the victim E, and KRW 1 million to the victim F in return for sexual traffic.

It was false, and it acquired property benefits by failing to pay the money agreed in advance for sexual traffic after sexual intercourse with the victims.

3. The Defendant, from July 2, 2018 to July 16, 2018, does not engage in sexual traffic any longer for the Defendant from victim D, F, and E. to July 3, 2018.

arrow