1. The Plaintiff is within the scope of property inherited from the deceased C, Defendant A is within the scope of property inherited from the deceased C, Defendant A is KRW 26,966,40, and Defendant B is within the scope of property inherited from the deceased C.

1. The facts alleged as the cause of the instant claim and the facts alleged as the cause of the instant claim by the Defendants, which were inherited by the Daegu Family Court No. 2015-Ma3356 following the deceased C’s death, may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap’s evidence No. 1 through 5.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants are obliged to pay the insurance money and damages for delay that the Plaintiff paid to the insured according to their respective inheritance shares within the scope of the property inherited from the network C.

Thus, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, Defendant A is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum from December 30, 2015 to February 17, 2016, the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, as requested by the Plaintiff, with respect to each of the above amounts, as to the money, KRW 26,966,40, and KRW 17,977,60, and KRW 17,60, as requested by the Plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.