logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고정2661
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 16, 2012, around 16:30 on October 16, 2012, the injured Defendant: (a) reported that the victim C talks with another person in front of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon apartment B apartment 106-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, with the victim; and (b) made an assault, such as walking the left side of the left side of the said C on one occasion, on the ground that the said C, which was next to the said C at the time of giving a return of money to D and said C, said C, which was going back to said C, said C, was said to be “if he changed the money.”

As a result, the Defendant brought to the above C a scarcity of a scarcity of the treatment days.

2. On November 5, 2012, at around 06:10, the Defendant destroyed two copies of a small glass hold in the amount of KRW 50,00,00,00,00 owned by the above C on the ground that the above C does not open a string door, on the following grounds: (a) on November 5, 2012, at around 06:10 apartment buildings 101, 706, the above C did not have any assaulted the above C; (b) but (c) on the ground that the above C does not open the string door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to opinions, CCTV photographs, glass photography photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction and damage of property), and selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant suffered from mental illness such as depression at the time of committing each of the instant crimes, and that the Defendant was in the state of mental disorder or mental disorder. As such, according to the health class and records, even though it is recognized that the Defendant was suffering from mental illness such as major depression, the Defendant did not have the ability to discern things at the time of committing each of the instant crimes, and therefore, the Defendant

Since it seems that there was a state or weak, the defendant's status is the same.

arrow