1. In the Defendant’s tender for a cooperative company for power distribution and construction in 2015 regarding high voltageA Corporation in 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is a corporation established for the purpose of the development, power generation, transmission, transformation, distribution, and business related thereto, and designated as a public corporation pursuant to the Act on the Management of Public Institutions. The Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant’s tender is a corporation that

B. On October 30, 2014, the Defendant, who was selected as a successful bidder, announced the bidding of a cooperative company for power distribution and construction (hereinafter “instant bidding”) in the year of 2015.

The Plaintiff and the Intervenor participated in the bid on the high-tensionA Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) among the construction works subject to the bid, and the Plaintiff was selected as the subject of the first-class qualification examination, and the Defendant’s Intervenor was designated as the subject of the second-class qualification examination. The Plaintiff, who is the subject of the first-class qualification examination, was selected as the successful bidder of the instant construction after undergoing the qualification examination on December 4, 2014.

C. On December 15, 2014, the Defendant, who was subject to the second priority examination of the instant construction, filed an objection with the Defendant on December 15, 2014, to the effect that “The confirmation of the performance of construction works (hereinafter “the confirmation of the performance of construction works”) among the documents submitted by the Plaintiff during the qualification examination process is false data, and thus, requests the confirmation of the fact thereof.” As such, on December 16, 2014, the Defendant requested confirmation of whether the confirmation of the performance of construction works submitted by the Plaintiff to the Gyeonggi-do Council of the Korea Electric Constructors Association was false, and on December 29, 2014, the Defendant received a reduction of KRW 2010,00,000 from the Korea Electric Constructors Association of Electrical Construction to the effect that “the construction performance was reduced to KRW 77,7700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”