A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported at the Defendant’s residence in Manyang-gu C and 201, that “A person who wishes to singly sing and mixed with his own music at the home,” and requested several times to reduce the Defendant’s music music; (b) the Defendant repeatedly stated that “A police officer’s act of raising the thorium’s music music will be reduced by 3 times repeatedly; and (c) the Defendant entered the Defendant’s own music floor to sing the Defendant’s finger to sing, singing, singing, and singing, “A” to sing the Defendant’s own music to singe and sing the Defendant’s finger to sing the Defendant’s finger to sing, sing, singing, and singing the Defendant’s finger to sing the Defendant’s finger to sing the Defendant’s finger.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (the decision of sentence in June 1 to June) (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) (the decision of sentence in June 1 to June) / The background of the crime, the degree of violence, the circumstances after the crime, the character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, etc. shall be taken into account.