(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.09 2018노579 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.09 2018노579

상해등

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged.

However, the court below rendered not guilty of this part of the facts charged, and the judgment of the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court (one million won in penalty) is too unhued and unfair.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. On December 25, 2016, the summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant avoided the Defendant from the Defendant at the small room of the Defendant, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, 111-dong D apartment 302, 111-dong 302; and (b) obstructed the Defendant’s visit to a small door and wall; (c) contacted the victim’s body on the part of the victim’s her soften; (d) the victim was faced with the victim’s body by pushing the victim with the victim’s body; and (e) the head was pushed the victim with the victim’s body softened; and (e) the victim was tightly pushed the victim with the victim’s body softened; and (e) the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s part of the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s f.

2) The lower court determined that the Defendant injured the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged only by the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, which was written in detail in the part of the lower judgment’s acquittal.

It is difficult to conclude it.

Based on the judgment of the court, the facts charged were acquitted.

3) Examining the circumstances presented by the court below in comparison with records, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable, and in addition, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the victim was provided medical treatment on the essential part from February 2, 2015 to the date of the occurrence of the instant case.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2017.04.14 2017고합18

-춘천지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고합49

-인천지방법원 2020.08.13 2020고합316

-대전지방법원 2013.05.01 2013고합122

-대구지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고합315