logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1958. 2. 7. 선고 4290행상189 판결
[행정처분취소][집6행,001]
Main Issues

right of representation of a person who is not the wife of a person who is not a successor of property devolving upon the State

Summary of Judgment

It is improper for a person who has been recognized as a legal wife of A as the right of lease of a house leased for management to claim the right of interest on the house.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 15 of the Act on Asset Disposal for Reversion

Plaintiff-Appellant

Senior Security Officer;

Defendant-Appellee

Minister of Finance and Economy

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 57Da63 delivered on July 15, 1957

Reasons

The court below did not have any dispute between the parties that leased the instant house under the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare to the Annual Red, but it is difficult to find out that there is any mistake of fact, such as the theory of lawsuit, inasmuch as the plaintiff, based on evidence, has a key point to be recognized as the legal wife of the High Skin Red, claiming the right to interest in the instant house as a tobacco-based interest.

Justices Kim Jong-soo (Presiding Justice) (Presiding Justice)

arrow