1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is an apartment of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (11 Dong Dong 138, hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) The Defendant is an autonomous management body organized by occupants pursuant to relevant laws, such as the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings, for the efficient management and operation of the apartment of this case.

B. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a warranty contract on November 2, 2006 (hereinafter “Korean Housing Guarantee Contract”).

B) The Plaintiff entered into the same contract with the guaranty creditor as Kimpo-market for the warranty of the instant apartment (1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years of defects). Accordingly, the guaranty creditor was issued on the same day. The details of the warranty are as follows: (a) the warranty period of 1 C from November 15, 2006 to November 14, 207; (b) the warranty period of 1 C from November 15, 2006 to Nov. 15, 2006 to Nov. 14, 2008; and (c) the warranty period of 2D 2D 19,496,000 to Nov. 14, 2008; and (d) the warranty period of 3 E-T 5, 2006 to Nov. 15, 2006 to 14, 2005 to 16.14, 2015 to 16.16.14

C. On February 28, 2008, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, the Korea Housing Guarantee, and the Plaintiff seeking revocation of fraudulent act, etc. as the Incheon District Court 2008Gahap3295 against the Plaintiff’s provisional registration on some of the apartment units of this case (However, the part of the claim against the Korea Housing Guarantee was withdrawn on January 23, 2010.

2) On June 30, 2009, conciliation was concluded between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on June 30, 2009

b.0.0 c.