logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2017.07.12 2016가단6293
손실보상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff obtained a license for regular coastal passenger transport services and operates regular passenger service routes in the Seocheon-si and Ycheon-Sacheon-Sacheon-si, and the Defendant, a public service, is a state that executes the construction work of Hansando-Yacheon-Yacheon (hereinafter “instant construction work”).

B. As a result of the instant construction work, the two service routes of the Plaintiff’s passenger ships from August 12, 2014, which were operated by the Plaintiff were partly changed as follows.

(A evidence Nos. 4-1 and 2) The existing sea route of Dacheon-do with a new high-speed fishing village operating the Daecheon-do section: The existing sea route of Yancheon-do with a high-scale Gyeongcheon-do Gyeongcheon-do Gyeongcheon-do Gyeongcheon-do Gyeongcheon-do : The existing sea route of Yancheon-Sacheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do : Ocheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do Do, Ocheon-do Dacheon-do Dacheon-do Do, Ocheon-do Dacheon-do Do, Ocheon-do Do-do Dacheon-do Do, Ocheon-do Dacheon-do Do, Ocheon-do Do-do Dacheon-do Do.

C. On the other hand, the Plaintiff is also operating the Helsan High Speed, and the Helsan High Speed is running the area of the Helsan High Speed, which is “Sacheon-do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

(B) Prior to the alteration of the new high speed flowersho, the relationship between the subsequent sea route and the route of original high speed flowershoe shall be as shown in the separate sheet). [The grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, evidence 4-1, 2, 5, 8 through 11, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the construction work of this case was carried out by the Defendant due to the implementation of public works.

arrow