The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the defamation against the victim B, the Defendant did not make a statement as stated in paragraph (1) of the crime itself, and related to the defamation against the victim I, the Defendant’s statement is true, and the Defendant merely explained the situation at the special general meeting place confirming whether or not there was defamation. Thus, there was no intention of defamation, and the Defendant’s statement constitutes legitimate act.

B. The reasons for appeal that was withdrawn on March 9, 2018 and the reasons for appeal that was presented on May 2, 2018 are stated in the statement of reasons for appeal, which was stated in the statement of reasons for appeal, and the statement of reasons for appeal, which was presented on May 2, 2018, are stated to the effect that “if a person is found guilty for domestic affairs, it shall be the highest preference, and even if a person is found guilty for domestic affairs, it shall be determined as well.”

The punishment sentenced by the court below (five million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated in the first instance court as to the assertion on the point of defamation against the victim B, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding of the facts or misunderstanding of the legal principles.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

A) F at the lower court’s trial on April 25, 2016, “B” from the Defendant at a parking lot outside Dhop on April 25, 2016, is complicated male relations and disturbs private life.

A male tag has been cut off.

“I talk about the same purport in G” and talk about May 25, 2016 that I talk about the same purport in the way that I go to G.

E also stated in the original court, and H also stated in the original court on May 25, 2016.