logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.05.29 2013고정957
사기등
Text

A fine of 2,00,00 won for the crimes Nos. 1, 4, and 5 in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of 2,000 for the crimes No. 2, 3 in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for one year for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's net support on December 21, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 27, 2011, the Defendant told the victim at the victim D’s house located in Netcheon-si C that “I will not pay money to the young E and receive money from the young E. I will arrange the children in the family register. I would like to arrange the children at the attorney’s expense. I would like to change two million won at the attorney’s expense.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, it was thought that it will be used as living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to appoint a lawyer to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, was accused of the victim and received two million won from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving others.

" 2013 Highly 959"

2. Around 14:00 on August 19, 2013, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a Ft XG car at a section of approximately 200 meters from the Do in front of the Net East-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, without a driver’s license.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving the said Fcar.

On August 19, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car on August 14, 2013, and driven the two-lane road in front of the Sungcheon-dong, Sungcheon-do, Sung-dong, Sungcheon-do, along two-lanes from the Sung-dong, the Defendant continued to drive the said car at a speed of 40 to 50km each hour.

Since it was found that a person under the influence of alcohol on the right side of the defendant's driving direction at the time was found, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle and to properly manipulate the steering direction and the brake system and to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant is under the influence of alcohol by negligence while neglecting this.

arrow