1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The assertion and judgment

A. On May 21, 2014, while the Plaintiff was driving Oba (C) on May 21, 2014, the Plaintiff caused an accident of collision with the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle in front of the North west-do Office located in the north west-dong, Hacheon-do, Hacheon-do, Northwest-do, and the said accident occurred with respect to Oba, a total of KRW 27 million during the repair cost and the repair period.

(Plaintiff filed a claim for damages of KRW 55,675,00 in total, KRW 42,530,00 in the complaint for repair costs, KRW 2640,500 in the cost of purchasing damaged goods, KRW 10,500 in the amount of KRW 55,675,00 in the amount of KRW 10,00 in the amount of KRW 27 million in the second date for pleading. The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the repair cost, etc., KRW 27 million in the amount of KRW 27 million in the amount of damages.

B. The Defendant’s proof that he shocked the Plaintiff’s driver’s error is insufficient to recognize this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Although the Defendant indicated the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 1 (Traffic Accident Confirmation Board) as evidence, the contents only include the Plaintiff’s collision with the Plaintiff’s driver’s error.

Therefore, it is difficult to view that liability for damages caused by tort has occurred.

Even if it is recognized that the Defendant had shocked the Plaintiff’s driver’s automobile, there was a description and image of the evidence Nos. 2 through 5, 8 as evidence that the Plaintiff’s repair cost, etc. occurred on the part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s automobile. However, each of the above evidence alone is insufficient to deem that the amount of damages incurred on the Plaintiff’s driver’s automobile was specified, and no other evidence exists to acknowledge

In accordance with the purport of Gap evidence No. 6 and all pleadings, it seems that the plaintiff's driving was not owned by the plaintiff but owned by Eul, and the occurrence of a traffic accident does not immediately lead to the plaintiff's damage claim against the defendant due to a tort.