1. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, N, P, Q, R, T, T, W, and X shall each be indicated in the indication of the attached real estate to the Plaintiff.

1. Claim against the Defendants stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment based on constructive confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant H, I, M, U, and V is alleged as indicated in the grounds for the claim. However, the evidence No. 1 cannot be recognized only by the documents submitted and invoked by the Plaintiff, and it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff satisfied the obligation to obtain a provisional registration of security stated in the order as to each real estate stated in the text. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. According to the plaintiff's conclusion, each of the claims in this case against the defendants listed in Paragraph 1 of this case is reasonable, and each of the claims in this case against defendant H, I, M, U, and V is without merit.