A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for one year in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, Etc. at Seoul Southern District Court) and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2015, and is currently in the grace period.

【Criminal Facts】

"2015 Gohap345"

1. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 05:00 on July 21, 2015, on the ground that the victim D (year 74) who was his father at the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s and the third-story residential premises did not mislead him/her; (b) he/she gets off one time by using the texet, which is a dangerous thing for the head of the potential victim.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, who is a lineal ascendant, such as the number of days of treatment in need of furnal treatment.

2. On August 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 08:30, around August 11, 2015, 2015, under the influence of alcohol in the above residential area, had the victim D et al., who was in the main room without any justifiable reason, laid down the equipment such as fraud and misunderstanding, which was possessed by the victim E et al., on the floor, and the victim E et al. (the victim E et al.) who was living together, went against the victim E face; and (b) continued to put the equipment, such as meals, into the victim E.

As a result, the defendant damaged the victim D's property and carried dangerous things with the victim E, and inflicted an injury such as a failure to receive treatment days on the victim E.

"2015 Gohap346"

3. On July 13, 2015, around 22:42, 2015, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim F in Gystna-si in front of the Seoul National University (Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu); (b) said, the Defendant was driving the Defendant to Guro-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant’s house.

However, the defendant did not have the ability and intention to pay taxi expenses to the victim from the beginning because there was no means to pay taxi expenses, such as cash.

Nevertheless, the defendant, however, has the victim take the same day at around 23:25.