logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.12.29 2015가단5304
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s KRW 3 million on February 17, 2006 to the Defendant and the same year

3. 13.3 million won, and the same year.

3. 21.3 million won was remitted respectively.

B. From the account in the name of the Plaintiff to April 5, 2006, 3 million won to C, the same year

4.7.D 4 million won, for the same year.

4.7. The 23 million won was remitted to the Defendant, respectively.

C. On May 19, 2006, KRW 1.5 million was remitted to the Defendant from the account under the Plaintiff’s name.

On the other hand, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 300,000 on June 12, 2006, and the same year.

6. 22.8 million won was remitted.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 15 million won loan to the Defendant as to February 17, 2006 and the same year

3. 13.3 million won, and the same year.

3. On March 22, 2006, a transfer of KRW 15 million was made, and on March 22, 2006, a total of KRW 15 million was made by delivering six cashier’s checks at face value, without interest, and was repaid by the Defendant among them.

2) Upon receipt of a request from the Defendant to lend KRW 30 million from the Defendant, the head of the Tong in the name of the Plaintiff, which was deposited in KRW 30 million on April 5, 2006, was lent by means of delivering to the Defendant the passbook in the name of the Plaintiff. The interest rate was agreed by 10% per annum and the due date was July 5, 2006. (3) On May 19, 2006, the portion of KRW 1.5 million loan was lent to the Defendant without interest agreement.

4) Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid amount of KRW 37.6 million and the interest or delay damages thereon.

B. The defendant's assertion that around January 5, 2006, the plaintiff had been offered a subcontract from Indian Youth Co., Ltd., KT Cooperation Company and decided to conduct a partnership business with the plaintiff. The plaintiff's trade amounting to KRW 33.5 million from the plaintiff as its partner fee, KRW 3.5 million on February 17, 2006, and the same year

3. 13.3 million won, and the same year.

3. 21.3 million won, and the same year.

4.7.23 million won, and the same year;

5. The plaintiff merely received the total amount of 1.5 million won from the money and did not borrow money from the plaintiff, and the plaintiff thereafter.

arrow