logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.01.20 2014고정500
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B is a person who operates the “EMing practice room” in Kumi-si, Kumi-si.

No karaoke machine business operator shall sell or provide any alcoholic beverage.

Nevertheless, around 00:30 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant sold 3,000 won to customers F who found the above singing practice room.

(b) No one shall, for the purpose of profit-making, arrange any third person to provide entertainment to customers by drinking alcoholic beverages with customers, singing or dancing;

Nevertheless, at the same time as described in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant assisted A to drink alcohol, singing, or dance with F, which had been a guest in the singing practice room at the same place as described in the above paragraph (1).

2. No person who defendant A shall drink alcoholic beverages with customers, singing or dancing in a singing practice room for profit;

Nevertheless, at the same time as mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant drinking alcohol with F, a singing practice room, together with the above customer, or provided entertainment to the customer by singing or dancing at the same place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness F’s legal statement (the 60,00 won was paid to Defendant B in return for the provision of alcohol and gambling on the day of the commission of the crime, the number of times was found 30,00 won, and the 3 and 4 times had been requested to provide alcohol and gambling, and the beer had always been contained in water, which is not received, and this is the same on the day of the commission of the crime, and the same is the same on the day of the commission of the crime, and even before the day of the commission of the crime, Defendant A had talked that Defendant A will be able to do so. The purport was that Defendant A was found to have attempted to do so on the day of the commission of the crime)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and investigation reports (report on confirmation of the details of telephone conversations by police officers of the Control Police Officers);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow