Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 00:47 August 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the above police officers on the ground that E (the 48-year-old) was satisfyed by the Defendant’s finger, and the Defendant was satisfying the victim’s satisfy with his hand on the ground that he was bad, and assaulted the victim on the ground that the Defendant was satisfying, he was in his finger, and the victim was satisfyed, and the Defendant was in charge of the Defendant’s satisfying, and the Defendant was in charge of the Defendant’s satisfying the victim’s sat, and was in charge of the Defendant’s satisfying the victim’s sat at the floor, and reported that he was to confirm the circumstances of the case by arriving at the site, and that he was unsatfying the Defendant’s sat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, E, and I;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment prescribed for the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties against H, which are more serious, among the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties above);

1. Selection of each sentence and each fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less than the nature of the crime in this case in light of the motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, method of the crime, and the anti-social nature of the crime in this case that interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation. However, the defendant is found to have no criminal power except for a disposition of suspension of indictment by the prosecution around 2009, and the defendant is insulting from E in the drinking place after questioning the mother and her mother together with her mother.