logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.20 2017고단1643
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The person who was the auditor of the reconstruction and consolidation project association in the Busan Suwon-gu, Busan-gu.

In fact, on June 1, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written petition against the victim D on charges of occupational breach of trust to the Busan Southern Police Station, but it is difficult to recognize such charges, and the case was terminated on September 5, 2016, and it was not forwarded to the prosecution.

1. The Defendant posted a notice to the effect that the above union head D, the president of the union, did not work full-time in connection with the audit recommendation (not known) upon accessing the above union’s “C Housing Reconstruction Maintenance and Improvement Project Association” site, but on the ground that the notice by the E election management members and FF members were reported to the effect that it would inappropriate to post the notice on the following car page, this paper goes against the comments to the effect that the notice by the Defendant was sent on March 1, 2017, on March 1, 2017, and on the following car page, from the Defendant’s dwelling at the Busan Suwon-gu G and 102 Dong 101, the Defendant sent the comments to the prosecution.

“In addition to the writing “,” the first sign photograph of the petition and the photograph of the result of the case processing were expressed in writing as comments.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged honor by openly pointing false facts.

2. On April 11, 2017, the Defendant continued to conduct an aviation office in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government Office on the Dong 2, Busan Gangseo-do, on the ground that the Defendant had filed an objection against the victim D’s audit results report, and had the victim reviewed the relevant contents, the Defendant was in the process of raising an objection against the victim D’s audit results report, and on the ground that the Defendant had been transferred to the Dong 2 branch office of the instant union (2 Dong 608) the members of H (2 Dong 608) “

It is necessary to confirm that there is a suspicion of suspicion, and in writing, "materials are put on a car page."

Cleared, I was sent.

“.......” comments on comments.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged honor by openly pointing false facts.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

B. The victim does not want punishment after the prosecution of this case.

arrow