The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (700,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. The Criminal Procedure Act of Korea, which takes the principle of court-oriented trials and the principle of direct determination, has a unique area of the first instance in the determination of sentencing, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the determination of sentencing (Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). It is recognized that the Defendant appears in the attitude to recognize and reflect the instant crime. However, the lower court appears to have determined the Defendant’s punishment in light of the above circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower court, and comprehensively taking account of all the factors of sentencing as shown in the instant records and the trial process, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and environment, and the motive, means and method of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion or is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that the "indoor Camp Practice Center" of the 5 criminal facts is an indoor shooting practice hall, it is correct in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure).