logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.07.01 2012가단57354
횡령금 등 반환
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 56,419,370 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from March 12, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) In the case of Namyang-si, the apartment complex is composed of 1 complex 8 units, 372 units, 8 units, 462 units, 16 units, 834 units, 16 units, and 834 units.

B. The occupant and user of the above apartment complex decided to manage the two complexes separately from the one complex. Accordingly, around September 2007, the council of occupants' representatives of the two complexes was formed, the management rules of the above apartment complex two complexes (hereinafter "the apartment complex of this case") were separately established. On February 1, 2008, the council of occupants' representatives, which is the chairperson of the defendant, formed a council of occupants' representatives with the chairperson of the defendant as the chairperson of the committee of occupants' representatives (hereinafter "Gu competition"), and completed the report on the composition of the remaining-ju City Mayor in accordance with the Housing Act.

Then, around September 18, 2008, the old Grand Conference entered into an entrustment management contract on the apartment management in this case with the Integrated Management Co., Ltd. of Taelim Housing (hereinafter “Tlim Housing”).

C. However, around August 2009, occupants, including D, alleged that the former 10-year 2009 10-year 10-year 10-year 2009 10-year 1000 10-year 1000 10-2000 10-200 10-200 10-20-200 10-20-200 20-200 20-200 20-200 20-200-200-200

Article 18 (4) of the Management Rules of this case with the written consent of at least 2/3 of the occupants, etc. (at least 309 households, among 462 households) up to September 14, 2009, in the name of the management office of the apartment of this case and the joint name of the apartment of this case, shall be subject to the written consent of at least 2/3 of the occupants, etc. when the council of occupants' representatives has caused property losses, etc. to the occupants, etc. due to the defects caused intentionally or by gross negligence, the occupants, etc. may decide with the written consent of at least 2/3 of the occupants, etc., and the effect of the decision of dissolution shall be the written consent of at least 2

arrow