The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (ten months of imprisonment, two years of probation, two years of probation, observation of protection, and community service order 200 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the degree of injury to the victim is not serious, the fact that the investigative agency has agreed with the victim, etc. is favorable to the defendant. However, each of the crimes of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that each of the crimes of this case is committed even if the defendant caused a traffic accident by negligence and it is difficult for him to detect him/her without a license despite his/her excessive driving, and that each of the crimes of this case is committed even if he/she had caused a traffic accident, and that the crime of this case is committed even if he/she had caused a traffic accident, and the case of each of the crimes is not easy, and the defendant is not faithfully in the trial process

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.