The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below does not good health, the defendant agreed with the victims, and committed the crime of this case seriously reflects his mistake. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of a fine even though he was sentenced to a punishment of a fine on one occasion during the suspension period of imprisonment with prison labor sentenced for the same kind of crime, and the crime of this case committed the crime of this case without being aware of it. The defendant committed the crime of this case by driving the cargo under the influence of 0.214% of the blood alcohol concentration at the central line while driving the vehicle under the influence of 0.214% of the vehicle with the central line, resulting in an injury to the victim F by driving the vehicle by the negligence of the victims who driven the central line, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures even after destroying the victims' vehicle, and the nature and circumstances of the crime and the crime were very heavy, and other various circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the term "F" described below 6th, in two pages below the judgment of the court below, shall be changed to "D", and the term "D" described below 5th in the same section to "F".