logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.05 2015고정2753
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, and around 14:00, the Defendant: (b) recorded the conversation between the victim D (the age of 52) and the Defendant, and assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim D (the age of 52) recorded the conversation and talks about the fact of the Defendant’s unknown identity.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The portion not guilty of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. On January 19, 2015, around 14:00 on January 19, 2015, the summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant, who was set up in the large ecological park P5 parking lot in the Gangseo-gu Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan, by drinking a son D (the son, the 52-year old 52-year son) by drinking a son within the amburged car.

2. The judgment of the defendant asserts that there was a fact that he was prevented from suffering a victim at the time and place indicated in the above facts charged, but that there was no price with the victim's coaches. In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, which can be acknowledged by the record, on the date of the complaint, the victim went back from the police station as the defendant knew of recording and took a Handphone, and requested the return of the recording, and the defendant sought assistance, such as moving away from the lane and moving a handphone to the nearby person. The defendant forced the defendant to go on the vehicle again and forced him to go on the vehicle, and thereafter he was driven again while the defendant was driving. After that, the victim stated to the effect that "the victim sent a son's sexual relationship with the defendant to drinking again," but the victim was not present at this court as a witness, and the defendant took a handphone of the victim's vehicle in the parking lot and got off the vehicle in the presence of the victim.

arrow