1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Plaintiff

On October 11, 2018, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant and the plaintiff to provide consulting services on the reduction of electricity rates to the defendant, and to receive fees calculated on the basis of the amount of reduction for 48 months, and provided the defendant with consulting on the reduction of electricity rates to the defendant.

However, the Defendant did not pay the above fee, and in such a case, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the claim for the compensation calculated on the basis of the amount to be saved in the future.

Judgment

According to Gap evidence No. 3, Oct. 11, 2018, the plaintiff and the defendant conduct construction necessary for the reduction consulting and the supplementation of facilities to the defendant, and the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the amount equivalent to 75% or 50% of the electricity rate reduced for 48 months with the fee for the provision of the above service, and where the defendant does not pay the fee for three months or longer, the contract shall be deemed terminated and the fee for the remaining period shall be paid. However, even though it is acknowledged that the statement of evidence No. 4 is insufficient to acknowledge it with regard to whether the plaintiff performed the electric reduction consulting service under the above contract, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim on a different premise is without merit without further review.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.