All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. On the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment (a prison labor for 10 months, confiscation, and collection) of the original judgment is too unfasible, and the prosecutor too unfasible and unfair.

2. In light of the judgment, the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and against himself is an advantageous reason for sentencing, and the record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime is two times, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he was under the suspended execution period after being sentenced to two years of the suspended execution on May 12, 2015, and the business period is for a considerable period of time for 13 months.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, sex, career, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading up to the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of the change, the lower court’s judgment’s punishment is deemed appropriate. Therefore, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.