Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2017, the defendant, on June 10, 2017, has not paid the drinking value to customers.

“The victim E, F, and G, a police official belonging to the D branch, who was called upon the Defendant’s report, does not receive the drinking value to customers H. The victim’s “h” during the victim’s hearing.

(c) once 3:1 bit bitch bitch bitch.

C. The hacker’s publicly insultingd the victims by “Crackers.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation, power of attorney, each investigation report, recording file CDs;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion regarding the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is true, however, that the Defendant made the same speech as indicated in the facts charged, “Cals” is an expression of decentralization, and is bitch bitch bitch bitch.

“As a mixed standard language, there was no awareness of insult.”

주장하므로 보건대, 판시 각 증거에 의하면, 이 사건 공소사실 기재 일시 및 장소에 피고 인의 신고를 받고 E, F, G가 출동한 사실, 그 자리에서 피고인은 H이 술값을 내지 않는다며 H을 힐난하는 과정에서 출동한 경관들과 H으로부터 술값을 받아 달라는 말을 피고인이 하였는지 여부에 대하여 언쟁을 벌인 사실, 이러한 언쟁 도중 출동 경관들이 오히려 신고 자인 피고인을 탓한다고 생각한 피고인이 H가 듣고 있는 상황에서 경관들을 향해 “ 아 우 확 때려, 맞짱 까고 싶네,

D. Does c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. one c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c.

It can be recognized that the words “C. S. S. S. S., I. S.,” was read.