Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 14, 2016, the Defendant paid KRW 55,000 to business owners E at a sexual traffic business establishment, “D” located in building C B in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, and had F, a female employee, knife the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand and knife the Defendant’s sexual organ and knife below.

2. On May 3, 2016, at around 21:00, the Defendant paid KRW 65,000 to the business owner E at a sexual traffic business establishment as listed in paragraph 1, and had G, a female employee, knife and knife the Defendant’s sexual organ with his/her hand and knife and knife the Defendant’s sexual organ under the following conditions.

3. On May 10, 2016, at around 21:00, the Defendant paid KRW 65,000 to business owners E, and had H, a female employee, knife and knife the Defendant’s sexual flag with his/her hand and knife and knife below.

4. On June 9, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant paid KRW 65,000 to the business owner E at a sexual traffic business establishment listed in paragraph 1, and had I, a female employee, knife and knife the Defendant’s sexual organ with his/her hand and knife and knife the Defendant’s sexual organ below.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. List of books, copies of business site output, and copies and photographs of business places;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the call details [ although the defendant and his defense counsel asked by telephone any place of sexual traffic business listed in the judgment, they actually visited the above business establishment to the effect that they do not have sexual traffic.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (i) Party E, who operates a sexual traffic business establishment, memorys the Defendant as a son who was frequently in the business establishment; (ii) there is no high room to intervene in the part of the business establishment prepared by Party E; (iii) the customer (CT903) corresponding to the telephone number used by the Defendant in the above book is stored; and (iv) the Defendant is recorded as using the above business establishment in total four times; and (iv) the Defendant is called “alley.”