logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2014.06.03 2014고단53
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(45 years of age, women) are in de facto marital relationship from 2005 to 2013.

1. Damage to property;

A. On May 12, 2012, the Defendant destroyed and damaged an inner glass window where the market price of the Defendant and the victim’s joint ownership could not be known due to the brush, while the Defendant and the victim resided together with the victim in the house located in the Nam-gun, Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, around May 12, 2012, and the amount equivalent to KRW 10,000,000 at the market price of the victim.

B. On July 5, 2012, the Defendant destroyed an inner glass window that could not know the market price of the Defendant and the victim’s joint ownership due to a loss from a rupture while engaging in a dispute with the victim at the same time.

C. Around August 10, 2013, the Defendant destroyed the key to the rash car, the Defendant and the victim’s joint ownership of which are not known, while the Defendant had a rash dispute with the victim at the above-house around August 10, 2013.

On November 4, 2013, the Defendant, at the office above the o'clock, made use of red fluorial fences on the glass windows located at that office, stating that “The directors of the Defendant, for three years living in this house, have the same effect as “I do not have any number of persons who come from the directors, I have the same fluoral mari.”

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Intimidation against groups, deadly weapons, etc.);

A. On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) Hambmanddd the victim, who was in a dispute with the victim, and was in a late late October 2012, the Defendant threatened the victim with an article dangerous to the victim, referring to “humbing down the humf,” and “humbing the victim.”

B. On August 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in front of the community hall in the south-Namnam-gun, the Defendant: (b) called “the opening of a tea”; and (c) by inserting dangerous articles cited by the Defendant, which are dangerous articles cited by the Defendant, the Defendant is a dangerous object, such as: (a) placing the victim on the rash in the rash; and (b) intending to put the above insertings on the window of the driver’s seat; and (c) inserting them.

arrow