All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the lower court sentenced the Defendants to each sentence (in one year of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant A: two years of suspended execution; confiscation; two years of suspended execution in eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B; confiscation) is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unfasible and unreasonable, even if considering the following factors: (a) the Defendants agreed with some victims or deposited a considerable amount of damage; and (b) the sentencing conditions and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record and the changed theory, including the fact that the Defendants’ judgment was made in the

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

4. In accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, the court below’s decision shall be corrected as follows:

Attached Form

Crime sight table (1) - The date and time of No. 12 per annum shall be " March 8, 2015".

W. - The 17th day of each year shall be " March 12, 2015".

every day. The date set forth in Annex 3 (2) - The date set forth in Annex 3 shall be "2015-03-04".

every o. - Each 40 item shall be referred to “comforcing.”