A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months with prison labor for the crime of uttering of forged securities at the Cheongju District Court, and on June 27, 2008, at the Daegu District Court sentenced eight months for the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence) at the Daegu District Court on December 11, 2008, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 11, 2008, the said suspended sentence became void and the execution of the final sentence was terminated in the Ansan Prison on June 12, 2009

The defendant and B conspired to deceive the victim C by deceiving the victim C as if the proceeds occur through the sale and purchase of the flachising car from the proceeds of the transaction of the flachising car.

1. On August 2010, the above B decided that the victim would return the principal and interest to the victim within a week on the following grounds: “Around the end of August 2010, the victim would receive the payment for the payment for the intermediate payment from the victim: “If there is only 30 million won to purchase the intermediate payment due to the fall short of the intermittent value, the purchase would be possible, and the principal and interest would be refunded to only 30 million won per week on the face of the week.”

On September 1, 2010, the defendant and the above B made a false statement that "I would like not give the victim a down payment even if I would like to purchase the vehicle in part of the purchase price of the vehicle, because I would like to purchase the vehicle, I would like to purchase the vehicle. I would like to purchase the vehicle. I would like to purchase the vehicle. I would like to purchase the vehicle at the price of the vehicle. I would like to say that I would like to give the victim a down payment. I would like to say that I would like to purchase the vehicle."

In fact, the defendant and the above B did not intend to purchase the above Bosch Rexroth, and even if they received the money from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to purchase the above Bosch Rexroth.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and the above B were issued 10 million won on the same day under the name of the victim as the second purchase price for heavy vehicles by deceiving the victim as above.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property of the victim in collusion with the above B.

2. The Defendant and the above B around September 9, 2010 set forth “25 million won” to the Victim C.