logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2011.11.22 2010고정870
사기
Text

1. Defendant A is punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and each of the fines of KRW 2.5 million for Defendant B and the medical corporation C Foundation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The president of the C Foundation and the defendant A shall serve as the head of the headquarters of the C Foundation as the medical corporation.

1. Violation of the Mental Health Act;

A. The head of Defendant B’s mental medical institution, etc. requested the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to review the treatment of hospitalization, etc. every six months, when the hospitalization of a mentally ill person is conducted within six months, and where the continuous medical treatment is required after six months, he/she shall request the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to review the treatment of hospitalization, etc. However, on February 25, 2009, the Defendant continued to delay the application for hospitalization, etc. even if the period of 24 patients as shown in attached Table 1, such as G hospitalized in the relevant mental hospital in Sacheon-si F, 209,

B. The Defendant Cmedical Foundation delayed the Defendant’s application for continued hospitalization, etc., as described in paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s duties, as the Defendant’s representative.

2. On June 2009, Defendant A was notified by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of the reduction in the medical expenses for C hospitals in part from May 21, 2009 to May 31, 2009 on the ground that Defendant A had no psychiatrist from May 21, 2009 to May 31, 2009.

Defendant

A, while claiming medical expenses for June 2009 from June 2, 2009 for C Hospital inpatients patients to the Health Insurance Service, the victim of early July 2, 2009, A, despite being aware of the absence of a psychiatrist from June 2, 2009 to June 9, 2009, he/she shall instruct the C Hospital to claim medical expenses by submitting a false statement, as if he/she were hospitalized in the G Hospital in order to receive all of the medical expenses, 65 patients, including G, who were hospitalized in the G Hospital, were hospitalized in the G Hospital. On July 2009, 65 patients, including G, continued to be hospitalized in the C Hospital, and on June 2, 2009, were discharged from the G Hospital on June 1, 2009, and there was no fact that the above patients were hospitalized in the G Hospital on June 2, 2009.

arrow