logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.06.12 2019고단400
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the defendant's defense right is not disadvantaged, part of the facts charged was revised.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of B-E cargo vehicles.

On January 5, 2019, the Defendant driving the above cargo vehicle at around 06:15, and driving the street along the intersection in front of the “D” located in Gwangju City City, and proceeded to turn to the left at a speed of about 30 km per hour at the eth of the ethical slope.

At the time, the location was a three-lane intersection where traffic control is not carried out by signal apparatus, and the house price and upper point are concentrated, and the road that is not divided between the roadway and the sidewalk, led to the situation where the surrounding area was set up due to the new wall time zone, and the victim F.(59) was crossing the two-lane vehicular road facing H from the direction of “H” located in G.

In such a case, the driver of a motor vehicle must accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, and if the driver of a motor vehicle intends to turn to the left at the intersection as the surrounding field is left due to the new wall time, he has a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent the accident in advance by driving safely by properly examining the traffic conditions of the front left and right right and right and right and right and right and right and right and right

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceed to turn to the left without lowering the speed.

The victim who was crossing the roadway from the left side of the front line to the right side was not considered to be the victim, and was shocked to the front line of the cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered by the above negligence a serious injury, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebrovassis and an unidentified male in detail, focusing on the fact that the Defendant had no open address in the victim’s treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The K's statement;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition, and a CCTV-faging screen at the time of the accident, and concerning the speed of the vehicle at the time of the accident;

arrow