A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 201, 201, the defrauded: (a) the Defendant: (b) deceptioned the Defendant that, in fact, he was transferred KRW 2 million to the financial account (I) opened in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant on the part of the Defendant on October 25, 201; and (c) instead, even if he did not own a building on the part of the Defendant on active duty, he could not arrange the construction even if he received money from the victim on the part of the contracting party; (b) the Defendant, a person in charge of the field of the victim G, who was in charge of the victim G, owns a building in the part of active duty service; (c) planned to remodel the building; and (d) the construction amount is at least 20 billion won; and (d) by deceiving the Defendant that, around October 25, 2011, he received KRW 2 million from the victim to the financial account (I) opened in the name of the Defendant on the part of the said contracting party from July 21, 2012.

2. On November 201, 201, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act: (a) the Defendant, at an office at the site of the construction site of the said station, received support from the Gyeonggi-do budget for construction of the construction works laid underground, from H. In order to do so, the Defendant received KRW 700,000 from a public official working at the Gyeonggi-do Construction Headquarters as entertainment expenses for public officials; and (b) received KRW 700,000 from the Defendant’s financial account for the establishment of the said agricultural cooperative under the name of the Defendant around November 9, 2011 until September 26, 2012, and received KRW 670,000 from that time in total from that time to September 26, 2012 as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (2).

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony by a witness H and J;

1. Each of the defendants;